2009 13/04

Effective methods to learn a foreign language?

Browsing my Twine feeds I came across a study claiming to revolutionize language learning. According to some research carried out at Victoria University (NZ), the most efficient method to learn a foreign language is by constant exposure to sounds in that target language, even if the learner doesn’t understand them or know what they mean.

Well…WOW…Quite a statement, isn’t it?

278649026_2bba6acbf5_mThe researcher thinks that many language teachers won’t accept this theory. I’m a language teacher, and even though I believe there are many unknown and mysterious ways in our brains (that’s why I’m leery of ruling out any theory), I think this won’t explain why after living for years in Spain, most of the British and German citizens enjoying their retirement days in our coasts can’t (or won’t) speak a word in Spanish. I do definitely believe that frequent exposure to the target language DOES help…a lot (what’s the percentage of relevance and importance? 60? 70? 80?). But it might take something else. I’m not sure whether my parents are going to learn English faster just by watching  Aprende Inglés with R. Vaughan everyday (listening to a man or a woman talking non-stop with no interaction at all). Language is more than a string of arbitrary signs, it’s a social act. I’m sure I’d probably agree with Sulzberger point of view, but he should also take into account that language learning is a field where a) “experts” are very keen on magnifying effects and who easily discard a given method in favor of a “better one” just like that, in a split second, and all of a sudden there’s no other method than that, every single language school will either adopt it or die because learners (or parents) will be  requesting it;  b) can anyone remember audiolingualism days?

Probably the statement (grounded on Chomsky’s theories?) works best when we are babies because the brain is still forming the wires, we are exposed to the language since the fetus stage. I read once a report  (from Science) that said something like this: as babies we all are language universalists (indeed, the neural wires are still forming as Dr. Sulzberger also claims, we can distinguish all the sounds we hear) while as adults, we all are language specialists (by growing up exposed to a native language, we are specializing ourselves in that language’s sounds, reducing our ability to distinguish different sounds from other languages). It also depends on when, because that will also affect the place where we store that foreign language, i.e. in that area of the brain where our mother tongue is wired or somewhere else (i.e. uniform or divided Wernicke and Broca areas?) and the location of these spots may vary from one person to another.

Dr. Sulzberger claims that “when we are trying to learn new foreign words we are faced with sounds for which we may have absolutely no neural representation. A student trying to learn a foreign language may have few pre-existing neural structures to build on in order to remember the words” and I agree when he says that “teachers should recognise the importance of extensive aural exposure to a language. One hour a day of studying French text in a classroom is not enough—but an extra hour listening to it on the iPod would make a huge difference”. That’s why I’m always telling my students to engage in social web, to mingle with engines of engagement and communication such as Seesmic, Twitter, YouTube, etc. But they’re not (we’re not) blank slates anymore (critical period is over, quite limited brain plasticity)…What else then can we do to learn a language? What else does it take?
This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

4 Comments

  • Hello Elena,
    I cannot agree more with you and the ideas you express in this well-though article!! I think this method is being used in U.S.A as well and it is called “The Natural Method” with completely beginners. I have my doubts about its efficiency since some friends who are studying English there with this method feel really frustrated because they cannot communicate. They only do listening exercises but they do not know how they English language works. As you says in your article “language is a social act” and listening is just an area of the learning process.

  • Hello Elena,
    Congratulations for your blog! I cannot agree more with you and the ideas you express in this well-though article!! I think this method is being used in U.S.A as well and it is called “The Natural Method” with completely beginners. I have my doubts about its efficiency since some friends who are studying English there with this method feel really frustrated because they cannot communicate. They only do listening exercises but they do not know how they English language works. As you says in your article “language is a social act” and listening is just an area of the learning process.

    • Thanks Inma for your nice words. I agree with you about learners’ frustration: they can’t communicate at all (and we tend to be very impatient when learning a language) for a probably long period of time…
      Besides the context in which that learning takes place is very important. Learning a second language is not learning a foreign language.
      There are too many factors in SL/FL acquisition to single out just one method as the most efficient.
      Call me “holistic” ;)

Leave a Reply

copyright 2008-2009 E|FL 2.0 | The EFL20 Blog: TEFL, language learning, elearning2.0 and social web.


Using AcosminSIMPLE designed by Acosmin Premium